OddsJam Alternatives: Your Guide to Similar Sites

Alternatives become relevant primarily when bookmaker coverage, regional availability, or pricing structures differ from the reference platform.

Broad Market Coverage Option

rebelbetting official logo

Top choice for pre-match arbitrage and value betting. Covers the main US bookies.
2-week free trial

Fastest scanner

betburger logo for review

Fastest odds refresh rate (3.5sec in-play), many US bookies, focus mainly on the European market.
Free up to 1% profit

For EU & Africa

surebet.com logo

Scans over 400 bookmakers for pre-match sure bets, popular among beginners.
Cheapest service, free up to 1%

For US +EV bettors

betwasp-review

Fast in-play scanner, covers most US bookies, important sports, and markets.
Free up to 1% profit

Top similar sites to OddsJam

1. BetBurger

Summary:

BetBurger focuses on high-frequency scanning and cross-market arbitrage, prioritizing refresh speed and filter depth over simplified workflows.

It’s known for its comprehensive bookie, market, and sports coverage and user-friendly interface, making it suitable for users with varying levels of familiarity with odds comparison tools.

betburger-user-interface-oddsjam-alternative

Pros:

  • Has an odds scanning refresh rate of ~4 seconds for in-play events
  • It’s significantly cheaper both for pre-match and live scanning
  • Covers every sport and betting market relevant to bettors
  • Has the most advanced filtering system
  • You can have multiple, different types of filters active at the same time, even focusing on only a few markets of each sport.
  • Extensive bookmaker coverage for arbitrage opportunities
  • User-friendly and efficient interface

Cons:

  • Subscriptions can be pricey for casual bettors, but still cheaper than OddsJam
  • Limited functionality in the free version: max profitability of 1%/bet
  • Does not cover each US bookie
PropertiesOddsJamBetBurger
Pre-game arbYesYes
Live arbYesYes
Pre-game value softYesYes
Live value softYesYes
Scanning speed4.1/54.7/5
US Bookmakers35+40+
Sports725+
Markets912+
GuidesYesNo
Interface4.8/54.6/5
Price/month$199€79
Free7 daysUp to 1%
OddsJam vs BetBurger comparison

In case you need more info on their services, you can check the BetBurger review with scanning speed tests and guides on their other features.

2. RebelBetting

Summary:

RebelBetting emphasizes structured pre-match analysis with conservative filtering and stable data refresh cycles.

They cover over 8+ bookies from the US, but their main focus is on European bookies.

rebelbetting-interface-site-like-oddsjam

Pros:

  • Great reputation in offering accurate arbitrage and value betting opportunities
  • Excellent filtering options, even for applying tax% % or exchange fee%
  • Educational resources for newbies and a helpful community
  • 2-week free trial with opportunity filters capped at a predefined percentage threshold per event.
  • It has the most mobile-friendly interface compared to other similar services

Cons:

  • Does not have an in-play scanner
  • Focuses on European bookies, so US and Canadian bettors have a limited possibility of using them
PropertiesOddsJamRebelBetting
Pre-game arbYesYes
Live arbYesNo
Pre-game value softYesYes
Live value softYesNo
Scanning speed4.1/54.7/5
Bookmakers50+60+ (13+: US)
Sports710
Markets96+
GuidesYesYes
Interface4.8/54.6/5
Price/month$199€99
Free7 days14 days
Oddsjam vs RebelBetting comparison

3. BetWasp

Summary:

BetWasp targets US and Canadian markets with a streamlined scanner optimized for in-play value detection.

It’s designed to cater to both pre-match and live value betting opportunities (+EV bets).

I focused mostly on in-play value betting, and for this, BetWasp offers an alternative pricing model, competitive scanning speed, and an expanded filtering interface compared to some OddsJam plans.

betwasp-user-interface

As you can see in the screenshot above, it has the same interface as BetBurger.

They are the alternative product of the same company, with the difference of focusing only on bookies available for US and Canadian bettors.

Pros:

  • Both pre-match and in-play value betting opportunities are scanned
  • Real-time odds comparison feature with ~4 sec refresh rate
  • Advanced opportunity for filtering
  • Covers each relevant sport and bookie from the US and Canada
  • Has 1-day and 1-week subscription plans
  • It is significantly cheaper than OddsJam

Cons:

  • Sometimes they have issues with scanning Bet365 and Pinnacle
  • Not as mobile-friendly as its competitors

Need more info about their services? Check my dedicated BetWasp review.

betwasp-updated-pricing-plan

4. ProfitDuel

Summary:

ProfitDuel is a great replacement for OddsJam when it comes to bonus hunting / matched betting.

But when it comes to betting or sure betting, ProfitDuel is not the service that you want to use.

They are covering each relevant bookmaker from the US and Canada (which are their focus market).

profitduel-site-like-oddsjam

Pros:

  • Strong emphasis on teaching new customers how to place matched bets
  • The platform provides step-by-step educational materials intended to support users who are new to matched betting concepts.
  • They have bonus-specific guides, calculators, and tutorial videos
  • Affordable even for newbie bettors because of their free trial

Cons:

  • Only focuses on bookies available in the US and Canada
  • Limited in terms of direct odds comparison
  • Does not display sure bets with high-profit percentage
  • Focuses only on pre-match betting opportunities

5. Surebet.com

Summary:

Surebet.com is designed for users who want to monitor arbitrage situations across multiple bookmakers.

It provides tools and resources for identifying profitable betting situations across various sportsbooks from all around the world.

surebet-cheap-oddsjam-alternative

Pros:

  • Specializes in arbitrage betting
  • Covers over 500 bookies and each relevant betting market
  • Offers a no time-limited free trial
  • It is among the lower-priced options available for users focused on pre-match arbitrage monitoring.
  • For European, African, and Asian bettors, it is the best pick for pre-match sure betting

Cons:

  • Does not have every US and Canadian betting site
  • The interface is not mobile-friendly
  • They lack filters when it comes to betting markets
PropertiesOddsJamSurebet.com
Pre-game arbYesYes
Live arbYesNo
Pre-game value softYesYes
Live value softYesNo
Scanning speed4.1/54.0/5
US Bookmakers35+20+
Sports730+
Markets912+
GuidesYesNo
Interface4.8/54.0/5
Price/month$199€25.9
Free7 daysUp to 1%
OddsJam vs Surebet comparison

6. BetOnValue

Summary:

BetOnValue offers a comprehensive approach to odds comparison and arbitrage betting.

It boasts a wide array of features and covers a vast range of sports and events.

Compared to OddsJam, BetOnValue’s coverage is primarily concentrated on European bookmakers.

betonvalue-oddjsam-alternative-site-for-odds-comparison

Pros:

  • Extensive range of sports and events covered.
  • Comprehensive odds comparison and arbitrage tools with a fast refresh rate of odds of ~7 seconds
  • The subscription plans are cheaper than those at OddsJam
  • They cover each relevant and even smaller betting market

Cons:

  • The interface can be overwhelming for new users
  • Mobile friendliness is not their strength

What Makes them Popular Among Bettors?

Oddsjam’s popularity largely stems from its real-time odds comparison from numerous sportsbooks, its ability to highlight pricing discrepancies across sportsbooks, combined with a broad set of analytical tools.

These features cater to both novice and experienced bettors, providing structured data that users can evaluate when comparing betting markets.

Why look for a replacements?

So, why consider replacements? It could be due to the need for different features, availability issues in specific regions, or simply the desire to explore platforms with different user interfaces or pricing models.

Diversifying your betting tools can also offer broader market insights.

Which platforms surface the highest volume of executable opportunities?

Competitive odds are a key consideration when comparing betting markets across different platforms.

Sites like BetBurger and RebelBetting have emerged as strong contenders, offering a wide range of odds and betting options that rival Oddsjam.

These platforms are particularly known for their in-depth coverage of multiple sports and markets.

Which tools offer limited or trial-based access?

For bettors looking for a cost-effective solution, free alternatives like Rebelbetting and BetWasp offer basic odds comparison services.

While they might lack some advanced features of Oddsjam, they can serve as introductory tools for users exploring odds comparison features.

Which platforms prioritize interface simplicity?

User-friendliness can significantly enhance the betting experience.

Platforms like Oddschecker and OddsMonkey are renowned for their intuitive interfaces, making navigation and comparison of odds straightforward for users at all levels.

How Do International Alternatives Compare?

Internationally, sites like BetBurger and RebelBetting have gained traction as OddsJam alternatives. These platforms cater to a global audience and offer a variety of betting options, currency support, and language options.

What are the best replacements for Live Betting?

Live betting analytics are crucial for in-play betting. Platforms like BetWasp and BetBurger offer real-time data and analytics, providing real-time market data that reflects live odds movements during events.

These sites cover both US and international bookies.

A newcomer must mention service is Pick The Odds. Learn more about them in our Pick The Odds Review.

How do I test & rank these services/software?

This framework is meticulously designed to provide a clear, unbiased evaluation, helping users identify the most suitable betting software for their individual needs and strategies.

  1. Refresh rate: Refresh rate measures the latency between bookmaker odds changes and their appearance in the platform feed.
  2. Scanning errors: This factor assesses the reliability of the database in prediction-based software and the accuracy of odds in comparison tools.
  3. Filters: Evaluate the depth and effectiveness of filtering options. Software enabling users to finely tune opportunities to their betting strategies scores higher.
  4. Bookies scanned: Particularly crucial for odds comparison tools, this factor examines the number of bookmakers covered. Comprehensive coverage leads to higher scores.
  5. Price/Value Ratio: Considers the software’s cost relative to its feature set, data coverage, and access limitations., including considerations like free trials and money-back guarantees.
  6. Reliability: Focuses on the software’s uptime and customer service quality, penalizing tools with frequent errors or inadequate support.
  7. Public User Reviews: Incorporates feedback from actual users, providing insights into the software’s real-world performance and user satisfaction.
  8. Beginner-Friendliness: Beginner accessibility evaluates onboarding clarity, default filter usability, and availability of guided documentation.

Each factor carries a specific weight, reflecting its relevance for users comparing analytical betting software.

Conclusion

While the reference platform remains widely used, alternatives may better align with specific regional access, execution preferences, or budget constraints. Each platform has its unique strengths, and depending on your betting preferences, you may find a platform that aligns more closely with your regional access or analytical preferences.